BJMO - , issue ,
D. Schrijvers MD, PhD
Prior infections may reactivate in cancer patients receiving immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory treatments. Depending on the severity of the immune suppression, chemoprophylaxis may be necessary and is recommended in Herpes simplex virus- and Herpes zoster virus-seropositive patients undergoing allogenous hematologic stem cell transplantation and in solid cancer patients with Hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis B core antibody seropositivity.
For other infections, a low threshold for performing diagnostic testing of potential viral or tuberculosis infections should be used should be used in daily clinical practice in order to prevent severe morbidity or mortality.
Read moreBJMO - volume 13, issue 7, november 2019
D. Schrijvers MD, PhD
Many of the new drugs are registered based on phase II data and surrogate endpoints. The medical oncologist should know the limitations and dangers of such an approach. The value of phase II trials and surrogate endpoints as well as clinical meaningful results are discussed.
(BELG J MED ONCOL 2019;13(7):273–6)
Read moreBJMO - volume 13, issue 6, october 2019
P. Ost MD, PhD, D. Schrijvers MD, PhD, L. Duck MD, PhD, M. Gizzi MD, K. Goffin MD, PhD, S. Joniau MD, PhD, S. Rottey MD, PhD, T. Roumeguère MD, E. Seront MD, PhD, N. Withofs MD, PhD, B. Tombal MD, PhD
The treatment landscape for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has changed dramatically with the approval of a variety of therapeutic agents including abiraterone acetate, cabazitaxel, docetaxel, enzalutamide and radium-223 dichloride and the introduction of docetaxel and abiraterone acetate in combination with androgen deprivation therapy in newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Evidence on the optimal sequence of these therapies is scarce. In practice, the most appropriate treatment (sequence) depends on patient and disease characteristics. This article summarises the recommendations of a multidisciplinary group of Belgian experts in sequencing treatments for patients with mCRPC, with a focus on radium-223 dichloride.
(BELG J MED ONCOL 2019;13(6): 240–250)
Read moreBJMO - volume 13, issue 4, june 2019
D. Schrijvers MD, PhD
Patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer benefit from an early treatment in terms of metastasis-free survival. Three drugs were compared with placebo in large randomised trials (SPARTAN, PROSPER, ARAMIS) and all showed an improvement in median metastasis-free survival. They differ in some of the secondary endpoints and side effects. This article discusses the results and the impact for patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
(BELG J MED ONCOL 2019;13(4):129–131)
Read moreBJMO - volume 13, issue 1, february 2019
D. Schrijvers MD, PhD, A. Baitar , T. Debacker MD, F. van Acker
Radium-223 is one of the treatment options for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), based on the ALSYMPCA trail, a large randomised study.
In this retrospective study, the experience with radium-223 in patients with mCRPC, treated in a single centre, is reported in relation to the number of cycles of radium-223 given; reason of discontinuing radium-223 treatment, overall survival according to radium-223 treatments received; next treatment and interval to next treatment after discontinuing radium-223.
The Kaplan-Meier method was used to describe overall survival, and the log-rank was used to compare different groups.
Thirty-eight patients were analysed. A total of 26 patients (68.4%) completed all six cycles of radium-223, while twelve patients (31.6%) stopped treatment earlier. The reasons for discontinuing treatment early were progressive disease during treatment with radium-223 (four patients); myelotoxicity (one patient, who was previously treated for a small cell carcinoma of the ureter with six cycles of carboplatinum); intercurrent death due to non-prostate cancer-related diseases (four patients); patient refusal (one patient); complication due to co-morbid condition (one patient). And, one patient who stopped treatment after five cycles was lost to follow up.
Patients who completed all six cycles had a median survival time of 27.4 months (95% CI: 16.4-non applicable [NA; because the upper confidence limit never reaches the 50% survival]); and patients who completed one to four cycles 9.0 months (95% CI: 4.6-NA, log rank test: p<0.001).
Of the 26 patients who completed all six cycles, sixteen patients started another line of treatment for mCRPC after a median time of 30.0 weeks (95% CI: 18.1-NA) after the last injection of radium-223.
Radium-223 is an appropriate treatment for patients with mCRPC with a median overall survival of 27.4 months and a drug-free interval of 30 weeks after six cycles of radium-223.
(BELG J MED ONCOL 2019;13(1):16–20)
Read moreBJMO - volume 12, issue 7, november 2018
D. Schrijvers MD, PhD
Chemotherapy-induced anaemia is a well-known complication in cancer. With the venue of newer non-cytotoxic anti-cancer drugs, attention to anaemia and anaemia management has been shifted to the background. Nevertheless, anaemia is a frequent complication of some of these newer drugs. Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, some of the antiangiogenic drugs, poly (ADP ribose) polymerases inhibitors and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors all can cause grade 3 or 4 anaemia. This review discusses the risks of anaemia development of anti-cancer drugs.
(BELG J MED ONCOL 2018;12(7):307–312)
Read moreBJMO - volume 12, issue 5, september 2018
D. Schrijvers MD, PhD, L. van Asch , A. Van Goethem MD, E. Heylen , P. de Schouwer , S. van Eeckhout , V. Verheyen
Haematological and biochemical parameters are two of the important factors for safely administering oncological medication. These values should be available to the oncologist prior to administration of anticancer drugs in order to decide if they can be administered safely or if a dose reduction or postponement is necessary. In this project, the possibility of a blood sampling at home by a home care organisation 48–72 hours before the patient’s contact with the oncologist was evaluated to ensure that these parameters were available at the moment of consultation and to integrate these results in the patient electronic file.
From January 9, 2017, until April 30, 2017, 418 blood samplings were performed at home. Problems were not frequently encountered (4.7% of blood samplings). The pros and cons of this project are discussed. This project demonstrates that blood sampling at home is feasible and that the oncologist receives the required parameters in due time to ensure safe prescription and administration of anticancer medication.
(BELG J MED ONCOL 2018;12(5):247–251)
Read more
Top
